USPTO serial 75859899
PRODUCTION OFFICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRODUCTION OFFICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN H. BOUCHARD
JOHN H BOUCHARD C/O GEOQUEST, A DIVISION OFSCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION5599 SAN FELIPE, STE 1700HOUSTON, TX 77056-2722Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | AN INTEGRATED SUITE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS ADAPTED FOR USE BY A RESERVOIR ENGINEER WHICH ALLOWS THE ENGINEER TO USE THE INTEGRATED FEATURE OF SUCH APPLICATIONS TO PERFORM AN ENGINEERING ANALYSIS OF A RESERVOIR FIELD FOR THE PURPOSE OF LOCATING SUBSURFACE DEPOSITS OF HYDROCARBON INCLUDING LOADING, MANAGING, INTERPRETING, AND MAPPING RESERVOIR FIELD DATA AND MANUALS DISTRIBUTED THEREWITH | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |