Drawing for PRODUCTION OFFICE

USPTO serial 75859899

PRODUCTION OFFICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRODUCTION OFFICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN H. BOUCHARD

JOHN H BOUCHARD C/O GEOQUEST, A DIVISION OFSCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION5599 SAN FELIPE, STE 1700HOUSTON, TX 77056-2722

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009AN INTEGRATED SUITE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS ADAPTED FOR USE BY A RESERVOIR ENGINEER WHICH ALLOWS THE ENGINEER TO USE THE INTEGRATED FEATURE OF SUCH APPLICATIONS TO PERFORM AN ENGINEERING ANALYSIS OF A RESERVOIR FIELD FOR THE PURPOSE OF LOCATING SUBSURFACE DEPOSITS OF HYDROCARBON INCLUDING LOADING, MANAGING, INTERPRETING, AND MAPPING RESERVOIR FIELD DATA AND MANUALS DISTRIBUTED THEREWITHACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 4, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 4, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jun 13, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Nov 22, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 29, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance