USPTO serial 75860135
PORNSTAR.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2911829Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 14, 2004
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PORNSTAR.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SOUTH HILL, AI
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
DIRECT DISTRIBUTIONS ENTERPRISES, INC.
GLEN COVER, NY
Other trademarks owned by DIRECT DISTRIBUTIONS ENTERPRISES, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas N. Masters
Douglas N. Masters LOEB & LOEB LLP321 N. Clark St., Suite 2300Chicago, IL 60654UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, providing adult-oriented information and services over a computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 4, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARCADIA HOLDINGS, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by XPays LLC
- Other trademarks owned by XPays LLC
- Other trademarks owned by DIRECT DISTRIBUTIONS ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named PORNSTAR.COM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 8, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 7, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 6, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |