USPTO serial 75861008
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin D. ERICKSON
KEVIN D ERICKSON PAULEY PETERSEN KINNE & FEJER2800 W HIGGINS RDSTE 365HOFFMAN ESTATES, IL 60195| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Energy related services, namely, performing energy audits for others, providing consultation in the field of energy utilization, providing consultation in the field of energy efficiency and environmental impact, and energy usage management services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 10, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 2, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2001 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |