Drawing for COMLINE

USPTO serial 75861448

COMLINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMLINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEWART J. BELLUS

STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD & ROE PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS RECORDED ON DATA CARRIERS AND/OR CONTAINED IN DATA MEMORIES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PROCESSING, SCANNING, ADAPTATION, STORAGE, ADMINISTRATION AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS IN INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL DOCUMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ADMINISTERING AND PROVIDING ACCESS TO ADDRESSES, STATISTICS, PRODUCT INFORMATION AND OTHER DATA IN DATABASES, GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKS, INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL NETWORKSACTIVE
016PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, MANUALS FOR USE OF DATA PROCESSING PROGRAMS AS CUSTOMER PRODUCT INFORMATIONACTIVE
042COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, DEVELOPMENT AND ESTABLISHMENT OF DATA PROCESSING PROGRAMS; DESIGN OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; PROVIDING TECHNICAL ADVICE FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; ENGINEERING SERVICES; COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY PLANNING AND SETTING UP HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL COMPUTER NETWORKS USED BY BUSINESSES; DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SEARCH ENGINE AND GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK SOFTWAREACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 23, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 23, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 26, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 4, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 27, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 4, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 20, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Dec 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance