USPTO serial 75861448
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
COMLINE GESELLSCHAFT FUR INNOVATIVE KOMMUNIKATIONSTECHNOLOGIE MBH
D-44227 Dortmund, DE
Other trademarks owned by COMLINE GESELLSCHAFT FUR INNOVATIVE KOMMUNIKATIONSTECHNOLOGIE MBH
COMLINE GESELLSCHAFT FUR INNOVATIVE KOMMUNIKATIONSTECHNOLOGIE MBH
D-44227 Dortmund, DE
Other trademarks owned by COMLINE GESELLSCHAFT FUR INNOVATIVE KOMMUNIKATIONSTECHNOLOGIE MBH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEWART J. BELLUS
STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD & ROE PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS RECORDED ON DATA CARRIERS AND/OR CONTAINED IN DATA MEMORIES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PROCESSING, SCANNING, ADAPTATION, STORAGE, ADMINISTRATION AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS IN INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL DOCUMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ADMINISTERING AND PROVIDING ACCESS TO ADDRESSES, STATISTICS, PRODUCT INFORMATION AND OTHER DATA IN DATABASES, GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKS, INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, MANUALS FOR USE OF DATA PROCESSING PROGRAMS AS CUSTOMER PRODUCT INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, DEVELOPMENT AND ESTABLISHMENT OF DATA PROCESSING PROGRAMS; DESIGN OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; PROVIDING TECHNICAL ADVICE FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; ENGINEERING SERVICES; COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY PLANNING AND SETTING UP HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL COMPUTER NETWORKS USED BY BUSINESSES; DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SEARCH ENGINE AND GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |