Drawing for Serial No. 75861534

USPTO serial 75861534

Serial No. 75861534

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with Serial No. 75861534?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L. Sapp

STEPHEN L SAPP LOCKE LIDDELL & SAPP LLP2200 ROSS AVE STE 2200DALLAS, TX 75201-6776UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Design services for others in the field of image processingACTIVEFeb 20, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2004ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
Dec 12, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 13, 2003ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
Oct 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 20, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 14, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 6, 2002SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Oct 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 8, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Sep 18, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Aug 23, 2002REINREINSTATED
Jun 6, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 5, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 19, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 19, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Nov 18, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 17, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 19, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 26, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 12, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 7, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Jul 5, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jun 6, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 31, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
May 16, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance