USPTO serial 75861534
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Sapp
STEPHEN L SAPP LOCKE LIDDELL & SAPP LLP2200 ROSS AVE STE 2200DALLAS, TX 75201-6776UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design services for others in the field of image processing | ACTIVE | Feb 20, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2004 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 26, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |