USPTO serial 75861572
GIVE 'EM THE GOOD STUFF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GIVE 'EM THE GOOD STUFF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE, S.A.
1800 VEVEY, CH
Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc.
Oakland, CA
Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc.
Oakland, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony J. Malutta
ANTHONY J MALUTTA TOWNSEND & TOWNSEND & CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | ICE CREAM CONFECTIONS; FROZEN DAIRY AND NON-DAIRY CONFECTIONS; ICE CREAM NOVELTIES, NAMELY, ICE CREAM CAKES, SUNDAES, PARFAITS, ICE CREAM SANDWICHES, ICE CREAM POPS; FROZEN DAIRY NOVELTIES, NAMELY, FRUIT ICES; FROZEN DAIRY AND NON-DAIRY DESSERTS; FROZEN REDUCED FAT, LOW FAT, AND FAT FREE DAIRY AND NON-DAIRY DESSERTS; ICE MILK; SORBETS; SHERBETS; WATER ICES; FROZEN FRUIT JUICE BARS; FROZEN FRUIT JUICE FLAVORED BARS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named GIVE 'EM THE GOOD STUFF
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 21, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 16, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 17, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 3, 2002 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |