USPTO serial 75861779
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Myron Amer
114 OLD COUNTRY RDSTE 310MINEOLA, NY 11501| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES | ACTIVE | May 1, 1989 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 9, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |