Drawing for 1-2-1 TRAVEL TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 75861884

1-2-1 TRAVEL TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 1-2-1 TRAVEL TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL J. SMITH

BLANK ROME COMISKY & MCCAULEY LLP ONE LOGAN SQ, PA 19103PHILIPPINES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN PROVIDING INFORMATION AND GRAPHICS ON A GLOBAL NETWORK AND CORPORATE INTRANETSACTIVE
039TRAVEL AGENCY SERVICES; LEISURE AND BUSINESS TRAVEL BOOKING; PROVIDING ONLINE LEISURE AND BUSINESS TRAVEL AGENCY SERVICES AND LEISURE AND BUSINESS TRAVEL PLANNING SERVICES, NAMELY, MAKING RESERVATIONS AND BOOKINGS FOR LEISURE AND BUSINESS TRANSPORTATIONACTIVE
042PROVIDING ONLINE LEISURE AND BUSINESS TRAVEL AGENCY SERVICES, NAMELY, MAKING RESERVATIONS AND BOOKINGS FOR TEMPORARY LEISURE AND BUSINESS LODGING; SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jan 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 19, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Mar 2, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jan 3, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 15, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance