USPTO serial 75862315
"DIAMONDS IN ACTION"
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with "DIAMONDS IN ACTION"?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
B-1190 BRUSSELS, BE
B-1190 BRUSSELS, BE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James N. Palik
JAMES N PALIK PENNIE & EDMONDS1155 AVE OF THE AMERICAS FL 17NEW YORK, NY 10036-2720UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES AND MACHINE TOOLS WITH DIAMOND PARTS, NAMELY, TILE SAWS, MASONRY SAWS, BRICK SAWS, FLOOR SAWS, WALL SAWS, WIRE SAWS, DRILL RIGS, GROOVERS AND GRINDERS; DIAMOND-BASED BITS, CUTTING AND ABRASIVE BLADES, FOR USE WITH POWER DRILLS AND POWER SAWS | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | HAND-OPERATED SAWS, DRILLS, SANDERS AND POLISHERS, WITH DIAMOND PARTS; BITS FOR HAND DRILLS WITH DIAMOND PARTS; DIAMOND BLADES FOR HAND SAWS | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | repair services of machines and machine tools and parts for machines, all having diamond components | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | material treatment services for metal, bricks, concrete, pipes and tiles - namely drilling, grinding, cutting, polishing and abrading - using machines, machine tools and parts, all having diamond components | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DIAMANT BOART S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by DIAMANT BOART S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named "DIAMONDS IN ACTION"
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |