USPTO serial 75862325
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norm D. St. Landau
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPNORM D ST LANDAU1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMS FOR USE IN ELECTRONIC SECURITY, ELECTRONIC SECURITY MANAGEMENT, ELECTRONIC SECURITY APPLICATIONS, DIGITAL CERTIFICATES, PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURES, ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES, CRYPTOGRAPHY, COMPUTER ENCRYPTION SOFTWARE FOR SECURE SALE SAND CONTROLLED DISTRIBUTION OF CONTENT OVER LOCAL AREA NETWORKS, WIDE AREA NETWORKS AND GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKS, COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS, COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER FIRMWARE FOR USE IN PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE, ELECTRONIC SECURITY, ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES,DATABASE MANAGEMENT CRYPTOGRAPHY; AND USER INSTRUCTIONAL MANUALS SOLD TOGETHER AS A UNIT | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN SERVICES FOR OTHERS, COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS, COMPUTER CONSULTATION, NAMELY CONSULTANCY AND ADVISORY SERVICES IN RELATION TO THE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND UPDATING OF COMPUTER SAND THE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, UPDATING AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER SECURITY CONSULTATION, NAMELY CONSULTING IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONIC SECURITY AND COMPUTER ENCRYPTION, INFORMATION SERVICES AND SYSTEMS RELATING TO THE FOREGOING | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |