USPTO serial 75862862
ESP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ESP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cranston, RI
Cranston, RI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THEODORE R. PAULDING
LEONARD B KATZMAN ESQ PARTRIDGE SNOW & HAHN LLP180 S MAIN STPROVIDENCE, RI 02903UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | ELECTRICALLY OPERATED ZONE VALVES FOR CONTROLLING HOT AND/OR CHILLED WATER FOR USE IN A WIDE VARIETY OF HEATING AND COOLING SYSTEM, NAMELY, SYSTEMS HAVING FAN COILS, RADIATOR, CONVECTOR, AIR HANDLERS AND RADIANT APPLICATIONS | ABANDONED | Sep 27, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |