Drawing for JUST FOR ME

USPTO serial 75863065

JUST FOR ME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with JUST FOR ME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL B CHESAL

MICHAEL B CHESAL KLUGER PERETZ KAPLAN & BERLINMIAMI CTR 17TH FL 201 S BISCAYNE BLVDMIAMI, FL 33131UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003bath care preparations, namely, shower gel, bath foam, bath salts, bath oils, body lotion, after bath splash and exfoliating scrub; hair care preparations, namely, shampoo and conditionerACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 15, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
May 15, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
May 15, 2003OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Mar 10, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Mar 10, 2003OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Dec 2, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Oct 7, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jul 25, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jun 25, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 5, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 19, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 27, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Nov 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 23, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 22, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance