USPTO serial 75863150
TALK2
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TALK2?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DIANE M. REED
KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR 620 NEWPORT CTR DRSIXTEENTH FLNEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMMUNICATIONS SOFTWARE USED TO ESTABLISH AND MANAGE CONNECTIONS BETWEEN A COMPUTER OR WIRELESS DEVICE AND A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, AND USED TO ACCESS, VIEW AND TRANSMIT INFORMATION, MESSAGES AND DATA VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK OR A WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICE; AND COMMUNICATIONS SOFTWARE USED TO ENCODE AND DECODE MESSAGES AND DATA TO PROVIDE SECURE COMMUNICATIONS OVER A COMPUTER NETWORK AND WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | DATA AND VOICE TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES AND ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS DEVICES; SECURE TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND DATA VIA A GLOBAL NETWORK AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS DEVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |