USPTO serial 75863151
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane M. Reed
KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR 620 NEWPORT CTR DRSIXTEENTH FLNEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMMUNICATIONS SOFTWARE USED TO ESTABLISH AND MANAGE CONNECTIONS BETWEEN A COMPUTER OR WIRELESS DEVICE AND A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, AND USED TO ACCESS, VIEW AND TRANSMIT INFORMATION, MESSAGES AND DATA VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK OR A WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICE; AND COMMUNICATIONS SOFTWARE USED TO ENCODE AND DECODE MESSAGES AND DATA TO PROVIDE SECURE COMMUNICATIONS OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | DATA AND VOICE TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SERVICES AND ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS DEVICES; SECURE TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND DATA VIA A GLOBAL NETWORK AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |