USPTO serial 75863297
EVOLVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EVOLVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas R. Vigil
THOMAS R VIGIL WELSH & KATZ, LTD120 S RIVERSIDE PLZ22ND FLCHICAGO, IL 60606-3912Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, CUSTOM MANUFACTURE ONLY OF COMPUTER PERIPHERALS USED IN CONTROL AND OPERATION OF COMPUTER FUNCTIONS, SUCH AS REMOTE CONTROLS, COMPUTER MICE, JOY STICKS, TRACK BALLS, AND KEYBOARDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | DESIGN OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED ONLY IN CONTROL AND OPERATION OF COMPUTER FUNCTIONS, SUCH AS, SOFTWARE FOR OPERATING A REMOTE CONTROL, A COMPUTER MOUSE, A JOY STICK, A TRACK BALL OR A KEYBOARD | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |