USPTO serial 75863421
TRE LIMONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 18, 2003
- Examiner
- LAW, CHRISTOPHER M
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TRE LIMONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Clearly Canadian Beverage Corporation
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Other trademarks owned by Clearly Canadian Beverage Corporation
Clearly Canadian Beverage Corporation
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Other trademarks owned by Clearly Canadian Beverage Corporation
Clearly Canadian Beverage Corporation
Vancouver, B.C., CA
Other trademarks owned by Clearly Canadian Beverage Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory N. Owen
GREGORY N OWEN OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON PC455 MARKET ST STE 1910SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | NON-ALCOHOLIC, CARBONATED AND NON-CARBONATED DRINKING WATER WITH FRUIT FLAVOURS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Clearly Canadian Beverage Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Clearly Canadian Beverage Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Clearly Canadian Beverage Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named TRE LIMONE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |