USPTO serial 75863589
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Elk Grove Village, IL
Morton Grove, IL
Morton Grove, IL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melissa S. Dillenbeck, Edwin A. Getz, Richard W. Young, Darren S. Cahr, Barry W. Sufrin, Nicole M. Murray, David J. Moorhead and Shawna M. Doran
Melissa S. Dillenbeck Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPSuite 3700191 N. Wacker DriveChicago, IL 60606| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | TOY ACTION FIGURES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 29, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |