USPTO serial 75863621
E-MICROWAVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E-MICROWAVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
24010 Sorisole (BG)., IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN B. SALAI
STEPHEN B SALAI HARTER SECREST & EMERY LLP1600 BAUSCH AND LOMB PLROCHESTER, NY 14604-2711UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LABORATORY SYSTEMS COMPOSED OF OVENS WHICH USE MICROWAVE RADIATION FOR HEATING, AND ELECTRONIC PARTS NAMELY COMMUNICATIONS INTERFACES FOR SUPPORTING DATA COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE LABORATORY SYSTEMS AND A REMOTE SERVER | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | PROVIDING DATA BY WAY OF ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION FOR THE CONTROL REMOTE OF LABORATORY SYSTEMS COMPOSED OF OVENS WHICH USE MICROWAVE RADIATION FOR HEATING, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF CONTROL AND MAINTENANCE SIGNALS FOR LABORATORY SYSTEMS COMPOSED OVENS WHICH USE MICROWAVE RADIATION FOR HEATING AND INCLUDE COMMUNICATION INTERFACES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |