USPTO serial 75863785
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
44791 Bochum, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen J. Strauss
STEPHEN J STRAUSS FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT LLPHOWARD HUGHES CTR6060 CTR DR 10TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | FIGURES OF FABRIC AND FUR | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | GAMES AND TOYS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, HAND HELD UNITS FOR PLAYING VIDEO AND ELECTRONIC GAMES, ELECTRONIC DART GAMES, JOY STICKS FOR VIDEO GAMES, AND PINBALL-TYPE GAMES; ADULT AND CHILDREN'S PARTY GAMES; CARD GAMES, BOARD GAMES; PARLOR GAMES; ROLE PLAYING GAMES; TARGET GAMES; EQUIPMENT FOR PLAYING PARTY GAMES, CARD GAMES AND BOARD GAMES; SOFT SCULPTURE TOYS; DOLLS; TOY FIGURES OF PLASTIC, RUBBER OR WOOD; SHIN, KNEE AND ELBOW GUARDS FOR ATHLETIC USE; PROTECTIVE PADDING, NAMELY, RIB PROTECTORS, SHIN PADS, KNEE PADS AND ELBOW PADS FOR ATHLETIC; ROLLER SKATES AND INLINE SKATES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |