USPTO serial 75863812
E-MAGINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHEFFIELD, SHARI
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E-MAGINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger P. Furey
ROGER P FUREY KATTEN MUCHIN ZAVIS ROSENMAN1025 THOMAS JEFFERSON ST NWE LOBBY STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Communications software used to access and transmit electronic bill information via the Internet from an on-line database featuring electronic billing services, account information, trouble-shooting and other customer support services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Teligent, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Teligent, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by STARTEC GLOBAL OPERATING COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named E-MAGINE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 19, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |