USPTO serial 75863922
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grant L. Hubbard
JESSE A ROTHWELL KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN ST FOURTEENTH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Nonalcoholic drinks, namely herbal tea and preparations for mixing herbal tea | ABANDONED | Jan 31, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 13, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 3, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | TCAS | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED STAT IS TTAB | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | TCAS | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED STAT IS TTAB | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | TCAL | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |