USPTO serial 75864056
EDUCATION THAT CLICKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EDUCATION THAT CLICKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Washington, DC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER J. RIEBLING
PETER J RIEBLING ARTER & HADDEN LLP1801 K ST NW3RD FL L ST ENTRANCEWASHINGTON, DC 20006-1304Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | PROVIDING AN ONLINE INTERACTIVE COMPUTER DATABASE FOR USE BY INSTRUCTORS AND STUDENTS FEATURING: EDUCATIONAL AND LEARNING RELATED INFORMATION FOR K-12, SECONDARY AND POST-SECONDARY EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS, INFORMATIONAL LINKS TO EDUCATIONAL AND LEARNING RELATED SOURCES ON THE INTERNET; AND PROVIDING ACCESS TO COURSE CONTENT USED IN CONNECTION WITH EDUCATIONAL AND LEARNING RELATED SOFTWARE AND ONLINE TEACHING AND INSTRUCTION FOR CLASSES WITHIN K-12, SECONDARY AND POST-SECONDARY INSTITUTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |