USPTO serial 75864063
POWERED BY BLACKBOARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POWERED BY BLACKBOARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Washington, DC, DC
Washington, DC, DC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER J. RIEBLING
PETER J RIEBLING ARTER & HADDEN LLP1801 K ST NWTHIRD FL L ST ENTRANCEWASHINGTON, DC 20006-1304Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | computer services, namely, providing computer bulletin boards, message boards and on-line facilities for real-time interaction with other computer users concerning topics related to education | ACTIVE | Feb 18, 2000 |
| 042 | providing a website featuring indexes of information, sites and other resources available on computer networks related to education | ACTIVE | Feb 18, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 15, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |