Drawing for SMARTMAIL

USPTO serial 75864123

SMARTMAIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CHOSID, ROBIN S
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTMAIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin R. Greenstein

MARTIN R GREENSTEIN TECHMARK55 S MARKET ST SIXTEENTH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Online communications services, namely, the electric transmission of messages and data, namely the creating, enhancing, modifying, receiving, exchanging, synchronizing and subsequent transmission of e-mail and electronic messages, either alone or with attached photographic files, graphic files, videos and image files, via a web site on a global computer networkACTIVE
042COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, CREATING AND MAINTAINING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS WHICH USERS CAN CREATE, ENHANCE, MODIFY, TRANSMIT, RECEIVE, EXCHANGE, STORE, AND SYNCHRONIZE ELECTRONIC MESSAGES AND E-MAIL, EITHER ALONE OR WITH ATTACHED PHOTOGRAPHIC FILES, GRAPHIC FILES, VIDEO AND IMAGE FILESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 30, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jun 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jun 7, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 21, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 10, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 1, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 9, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 10, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 17, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 17, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 16, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Oct 22, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 17, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 6, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 5, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance