USPTO serial 75864196
APPS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with APPS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LINDA HENRY, ESQ.
LINDA HENRY ESQ FENWICK & WEST LLPTWO PALO ALTO SQPALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | on-line service that allows users to access software applications, computer software programs, video games, digital books, CD- ROMs, DVDs, MP3 files, and a directory of online applications and application providers | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Computerized on-line retail services in the field of computer software programs, video games, CD-ROMs, DVDs, downloadable digital books and downloadable digital music files; computer services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others by providing an on-line directory comprised of lists of computer software application programs accessible via computer and communication networks; and computer services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others by providing an on-line directory comprised of lists of providers of on-line computer software application programs | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; computer software design and development for others | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |