USPTO serial 75864435
IFILM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2911321Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 14, 2004
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IFILM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hollywood, CA
Hollywood, CA
Hollywood, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Virginie Parant
Virginie Parant ARTech Law3500 W. Olive Avenue#300Burbank, CA 91505Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloaded files from a remote computer location, featuring motion picture and audio visual entertainment, namely, foreign, horror, comedy, drama, action, adventure, animation, children's, adult and independent films | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | books about films and film making | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Nov 24, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2011 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 30, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |