USPTO serial 75864547
LYCO SOY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LYCO SOY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mt. Kuring-gai, New South Wales, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas L. Hendricks
DOUGLAS L HENDRICKS MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Cereal-based bakery products, breads, cakes, cookies, savory cereal-based snack food, ready-to-eat cereal derived food bars, and breakfast cereals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |