Drawing for AUTOMATED CELL

USPTO serial 75864736

AUTOMATED CELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUTOMATED CELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ansel M. Schwartz

ANSEL M SCHWARTZONE STERLING PLZ201 N CRAIG ST STE 304PITTSBURGH, PA 15213

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042AUTOMATED CELL BIOLOGY SERVICES, NAMELY ANALYZING LIVING CELLS IN REGARD TO EXTERNAL STIMULI, FOR THERAPEUTIC DEVELOPMENTACTIVEMar 19, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 1, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 6, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 6, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Jan 3, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Nov 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 9, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 31, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jul 25, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 25, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Nov 30, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 6, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 2, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance