USPTO serial 75865083
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ned E. Barlas
NED E BARLAS AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLPONE COMMERCE SQ2005 MARKET ST STE 2200PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for digital audio and video processing; Software for digital audio and digital video processing for incorporation by original equipment manufacturers in personal computers and consumer electronics products; embedded software licensed to original equipment manufacturers for digital video and digital audio processing for use in digital versatile disc players, television, high definition televisions, digital televisions, digital video recorders, satellite broadcast television receivers, and set top boxes; embedded software licensed to original equipment manufacturers for navigating a global computer network; software for digital audio and video processing for use in Internet enabled high definition television reception and playback and signal processing; electronic components, namely, semiconductors; parts for personal computers, namely, integrated circuits and integrated circuit boards sold to original equipment manufacturers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |