USPTO serial 75865171
INTER@RCHIV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTER@RCHIV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia A. Cigelnik
PATRICIA A CIGELNIK53 W JACKSON BLVD STE 1616CHICAGO, IL 60604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE DIRECTED TO BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, MANAGEMENT, DATABASE ADMINISTRATION AND MAINTENANCE, AND OPERATIONS; COMPUTER HARDWARE; DATA PROCESSORS; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; COMPUTERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | COMPUTERIZED DATABASE ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT; DATA PROCESSING; PROVIDING COMPUTERIZED ON-LINE ORDERING FOR AUTOMOBILES AND OTHER PRODUCTS; PREPARING MAILING LISTS; PROVIDING COST/PRICE ANALYSES; DEMOGRAPHIC CONSULTATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTATION SERVICES, NAMELY, MAINTAINING DATA AND DATABASES FOR ARCHIVAL AND RETRIEVAL OF INFORMATION; MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS RELATING TO DATA SEARCH, BOTH INTERNALLY AND THROUGH A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; CONSULTING ON COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR DATA PROCESSING, PARTICULARLY IN THE FILED OF SYSTEM AND SIMULATION TECHNIQUES AS WELL AS QUALITY CONTROL; COMPUTER ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR OTHERS; PROVIDING TECHNICAL EXPERT OPINIONS IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTERS AND DATA PROCESSING; DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR CALCULATING, DETECTING, ADMINISTRATION AND EVALUATION OF LARGE DATA QUANTITIES; PROVIDING ANALYSIS OF STUDIES, PARTICULARLY OF FEASIBILITY STUDIES AND COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES; AND TECHNICAL CONSULTATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LARGE PROJECTS OF DATA PROCESSING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Infomatec Integrated Information Systems AG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INTER@RCHIV
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |