Drawing for NANO TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 75867812

NANO TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NANO TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wanda Howard

WANDA HOWARD BI PROPERTIES I INC3330 W FRIENDLY AVEGREENSBORO, NC 27410UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
022textile fibers use in the manufacture of fabricsACTIVE
023yarns for textile useACTIVE
024textile fabrics for use in the manufacture of clothing; textile fabrics for use in the manufacture of home furnishings; textile fabrics for use in the manufacture of furnishings for industrial and commercial use; and upholstery fabrics for home, industrial and commercial useACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
May 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 9, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 5, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 2, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance