USPTO serial 75867901
KOALA KARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KOALA KARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANA LYNN HARTJE CARDWELL
DANA LYNN HARTJE CARDWELL SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAYSTE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5141Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | HOUSE MARK FOR INFANT CARE ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, DIAPER CHANGING STATIONS, WALL-MOUNTED CHILD SEATS, INFANT SEATS, INFANT CRADLES, HIGHCHAIRS, CHILDRENS THEATER SEATS AND BOOSTER CHAIRS | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | HOUSE MARK FOR TOYS AND PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, CHILDREN'S WALL MOUNTED MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS, CHILDREN'S MULTIPLE ACTIVITY FLOOR MATS, MANIPULATIVE GAMES, TOY BUILDING BLOCKS, AND GAME TABLES; PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT; THEMED INDOOR AND OUTDOOR SOFT PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT AND PLAY AREAS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 19, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |