USPTO serial 75873632
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Sault Ste Marie, MI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew R. Basile
ANDREW R BASILE YOUNG & BASILE, PC3001 W BIG BEAVER RD STE 624TROY, MI 48084-3107UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely conducting online training classes in the field of computers, finance, investing, book keeping, cooking, languages, computer graphic design and layout, starting a small business, craft making, art, and photography via a global computing network | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2003 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |