USPTO serial 75875864
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Cerveceria Modelo, S.A. de C.V.
11320 Mexico, D.F., MX
Cerveceria Modelo, S.A. de C.V.
11320 Mexico, D.F., MX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A. Yanny
JOSEPH A YANNY YANNY & SMITH1925 CENTURY PARK E STE 1260LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-2713UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Sporting goods, namely flying disks, rubber balls, action balls, playground balls, sport balls, footballs, baseballs, basketballs, tennis balls, soccer balls, inflatable balls, foam balls, volleyballs, hockey pucks, boxing gloves, soccer goals, soccer nets, roller skates, tennis rackets, racket ball rackets, hockey sticks, baseball bats, baseball gloves, and gloves worn beneath or with baseball gloves, and gloves for gripping sporting equipment such as baseball bats and tennis rackets | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |