USPTO serial 75876067
PARAGON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PARAGON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. Scott Keller
R SCOTT KELLER WARNER NORCROSS & JUDD LLP900 FIFTH THIRD CTR111 LYON ST NWGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503-2487Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | OUTSIDE AIR SENSORS FOR MOTOR VEHICLES FOR MEASURING AIR QUALITY; ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC CONTROLS FOR MOTOR VEHICLES FOR CONTROLLING FRESH AIR QUALITY AS A FUNCTION OF THE AIR QUALITY, AND PARTS THEREFOR | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | UV-OZONE GENERATORS AND CORONA-OZONE GENERATORS FOR AIR-OZONISATION UNITS FOR MOTOR VEHICLES AND BUILDINGS; AIR FILTERS AND AIR CONDITIONING UNITS FOR BUILDING AND MOTOR VEHICLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |