USPTO serial 75876093
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VINCENT M AMBERLY
VINCENT M AMBERLY AMBERLY & ASSOCIATES7929 WESTPARK DR STE 202MC LEAN, VA 22102-4238UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | MARKETING MATERIALS, NAMELY, PRINTED FORMS USED IN THE MARKETING AND ADVERTISING OF GOODS AND SERVICES | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | May 29, 1998 |
| 035 | PUBLIC RELATIONS AND ADVERTISING AGENCY SERVICES, NAMELY, DEVELOPING AND PLACING MULTIMEDIA ADVERTISING AND MARKETING MATERIALS SUCH AS PRINTED ADVERTISEMENTS, PUBLIC RELATIONS BROCHURES, AND INTERACTIVE CD-ROMS, AND DEVELOPING PROMOTIONAL CAMPAIGNS FOR BUSINESSES | ACTIVE | May 29, 1998 |
| 038 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING, DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | May 29, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |