USPTO serial 75876218
B.F.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with B.F.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
358 25 Kraslice, CZ
358 25 Kraslice, CZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CAROLINE G. CHICOINE
SONDRA D SCHOL BLACKWELL SANDERS PEPER MARTIN24TH FL720 OLIVE STST LOUIS, MO 63101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 015 | MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; PARTS AND ACCESSORIES FOR MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, MOUTHPIECES, MUSIC STANDS, AND CASES THEREOF | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2004 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 22, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 3, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |