USPTO serial 75876351
STORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London, WIP 6ST, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LARRY F. GITLIN
LARRY F GITLIN RAPKIN & GITLIN5855 TOPANGA CANYON BLVDSTE 301 WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91387Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail shops featuring watches, and parts and fittings therefor; purses, luggage, wallets, and billfolds; casual clothing for men, women and children, namely jeans, shorts, t-shirts, shirts, jumpers, sweaters, trousers, jackets, coats, socks, stockings, none being waterproof; eyeglasses and sunglasses; shaving foam, pre-shave lotions and after shave lotions; talcum powder, hair sprays, hair shampoos and conditioners, hair gels, perfumes, colognes, eau de toilette, deodorants, antiperspirants, toilet water; cosmetics, namely mascara, eye liners, eye shadows, eye pencils, powder, lipstick; facial and body soaps; hand and body creams, bath salts, non-essential oils; non-medicated skin creams, lotions, oils; precious metals and alloys, and articles made therefrom, including jewelry; ornaments incorporating watches and clocks; precious stones, including diamonds, emeralds, sapphires, and rubies, and fine jewelry made therewith; time measuring instruments, including clocks and chronographs; travel bags, trunks, walking sticks; umbrellas and parasols; headgear including hats, visors, berets, ski masks and headbands; hair accessories, including hair bands, pony tail holders, clips, pins, barrettes, and hair claws; cosmetic jewelry, including necklaces, earrings, rings, bracelets, anklets; men's furnishings, including tie clips, tie pins, tie holders, cuff links, button covers, ear cuffs; formal footwear, including dress shoes for men and women; casual footwear, including tennis shoes, high tops, cross trainers, boots and sneakers, On-line retail services featuring watches, and parts and fittings therefor; purses, luggage, wallets, and billfolds; casual clothing for men, women and children, namely jeans, shorts, t-shirts, shirts, jumpers, sweaters, trousers, jackets, coats, socks, stockings, none being waterproof; eyeglasses and sunglasses; shaving foam, pre-shave lotions and after shave lotions; talcum powder, hair sprays, hair shampoos and conditioners, hair gels, perfumes, colognes, eau de toilette, deodorants, antiperspirants, toilet water; cosmetics, namely mascara, eye liners, eye shadows, eye pencils, powder, lipstick; facial and body soaps; hand and body creams, bath salts, non-essential oils; non-medicated skin creams, lotions, oils; precious metals and alloys, and articles made therefrom, including jewelry; ornaments incorporating watches and clocks; precious stones, including diamonds, emeralds, sapphires, and rubies, and fine jewelry made therewith; time measuring instruments, including clocks and chronographs; travel bags, trunks, walking sticks; umbrellas and parasols; headgear including hats, visors, berets, ski masks and headbands; hair accessories, including hair bands, pony tail holders, clips, pins, barrettes, and hair claws; cosmetic jewelry, including necklaces, earrings, rings, bracelets, anklets; men's furnishings, including tie clips, tie pins, tie holders, cuff links, button covers, ear cuffs; formal footwear, including dress shoes for men and women; casual footwear, including tennis shoes, high tops, cross trainers, boots and sneakers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2011 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 11, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2010 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |