USPTO serial 75876410
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Manhattan Beach, CA
Manhattan Beach, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marshall A. Lerner
MARSHALL A LERNER KLEINBERG & LERNER, LLP2049 CENTURY PARK ESTE 1080LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3150| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail footwear and clothing store services, mail order catalog services featuring footwear and clothing, on-line retail store services featuring footwear and clothing | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 18, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 9, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |