USPTO serial 75876467
ORCHESTRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORCHESTRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saint Jean de Vedas, 34430, FR
Saint Jean de Vedas, 34430, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Patch
Mark Lebow, Robert J. Patch, Andrew J. Patch, Beno YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison StreetSuite 500Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, sweaters, shirts, vests, skirts, pants, trousers, pullovers, dresses, t-shirts, jerseys, overalls, shorts, track suits, jackets, gabardines, waterproof clothing, namely, coats and overcoats; parkas, scarves, neckties, shawls, sashes for wear, gloves, hosiery, hats, caps, bathing suits, headwear, bandannas, neckerchiefs, berets, socks, tights, underclothing, teddies, undergarments, petticoats, underpants and underwear, brassieres, footwear, boots, slippers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 7, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |