USPTO serial 75876511
SECURE-STRIPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2586747Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 25, 2002
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SECURE-STRIPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carl A. Kukkonen, III
Carl A. Kukkonen, III Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, PC3580 Carmel Mountain Road, Ste 300San Diego, CA 92130UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SECURE MAGNETIC STRIPE CARD TECHNOLOGY PRODUCTS, NAMELY, MAGNETIC STRIPE CARD READERS, DECODING CHIPS, WIRELESS CARD READERS, MAGNETIC READ/WRITE/MODIFY HEADS, MAGNETIC ENCODING AND DECODING MACHINES, AND MAGNETIC MEDIA, NAMELY, MAGNETIC STRIPE CARDS, SMART CARDS AND CHIP CARDS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |