USPTO serial 75876516
WEBCOR DEVELOPMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEBCOR DEVELOPMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN MATEO, CA
SAN MATEO, CA
San Mateo, CA
San Mateo, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAMELA TY
PAMELA TY BOWLES & VERNA LLP2121 N CALIFORNIA BLVD STE 875WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT | ACTIVE | Feb 6, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WEBCOR CONSTRUCTION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WEBCOR, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WEBCOR BUILDERS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WEBCOR BUILDERS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named WEBCOR DEVELOPMENT
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2004 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 21, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |