Drawing for UR 12

USPTO serial 75876956

UR 12

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with UR 12?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Infant, toddler, junior, misses, women's, men's and maternity clothing, namely, sleepwear, shirts, blazers, raincoats, capes, jumpers, Bermuda shorts, athletic sweat suits, skirts, sandals, jackets, jeans, jerseys, jogging suits, knitted and woven tops and bottoms, leggings, leotards, lingerie, loungewear, mittens, night shirts, nightgowns, overcoats, pajamas, pants, pants-suits, panty girdles, panty hose, parkas, peignoir sets, polo shirts, pullovers, robes, scarves, shawls, shorts, skirts, slippers, socks, sports bras, sports coats, suits, suspenders, sweaters, sweatpants, sweatshirts, swimwear, tank tops, teddies, tennis shoes, thermal underwear, ties, tops, trousers, T-shirts, turtlenecks, undergarment thongs, undergarments, undergarment supports, namely, girdles, body shapers, undershirts and unitards; vests, warm-up suits, boots, dress shoes, bandannas, bathing suits, bathing trunks, bathrobes, bed jackets, belts for clothing, bike shirts, bike shorts, blouses, body brief, boots, boxer shorts, bras, bustiers, camisoles, camp shirts, cardigans, footwear, chemises, coats, corsets, crop tops, dresses, dressing gowns, gloves, headbands, headwear, namely, hats, caps, visor; hosiery, anoraksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 22, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 22, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 22, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 22, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Aug 10, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Feb 10, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Feb 9, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jan 26, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 2, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
May 3, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
May 2, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Oct 22, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 21, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 21, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 20, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 3, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jul 21, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 5, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 5, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Apr 5, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Feb 4, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Aug 1, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 7, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 19, 2001CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 23, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 15, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Mar 13, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 27, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance