USPTO serial 75876984
WUNDERBAR INTELLIGENT NUTRIENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WUNDERBAR INTELLIGENT NUTRIENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sherri L. Rohlf
SHERRI L ROHLF SIEGEL, BRILL, GREUPNER, DUFFY & FOSTER1300 WASHINGTON SQ100 WASHINGTON AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary supplements, snack bars containing soy protein, vitamins, minerals and herbs for nutritional purposes; and nutritional supplements in bar form containing soy protein, vitamins, minerals and herbs | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Food products, namely meat, fish, poultry, fruits, fresh and bottled vegetables, jellies, jams, cooking and edible oils, nuts, and snack bars containing soy protein, vitamins, minerals and herbs | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Wild rice, coffee, tea, cocoa, pasta, breads, pastries, frozen confectionery, sorbet, ice cream, sauces, spices, granola, muesli, breakfast cereals, cereals made of grains, fruits, nuts, vinegar, condiments, namely ketchup and mustard, relish | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Beers, drinking waters, fruit juices, vegetable juices, non-alcoholic beverages containing herbal extracts, powders, mixatives containing herbs and vitamins to be blended together with soy protein powder for use in the preparation of soft drinks, non-alcoholic beverages containing herbal extracts, malt syrups for soft drinks and powders for use in the preparation of soft drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Nutrients, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Nutrients, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named WUNDERBAR INTELLIGENT NUTRIENTS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 6, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |