USPTO serial 75877012
BERNARD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BERNARD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul I J Fleischut
PAUL I J FLEISCHUT SENNIGER POWERS LEAVITT & ROEDEL1 METROPOLITAN SQ 16TH FLST LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MICROACTIVE CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by Bernard Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Bernard Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named BERNARD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 23, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |