USPTO serial 75877083
GORILLAPARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GORILLAPARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London EC 1Y OUT, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deema Freij
GORILLAPARK INC1-9 MEMEL STLONDON, EC1Y 0UTUNITED KINGDOMGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultation, development and management services; communication and networking services; business auditing, account -management and invoicing services; human resource and benefits analysis services, personnel recruiting, training and management services; marketing and advertising services for others; referral services in the fields of business, public relations, communications, marketing, recruiting, human resources, health insurance, financial investments, real estate and computer services; attorney referrals; providing a web site on a global computer network providing business advice, counseling, management and referral services, personnel recruiting, training and management advice and services, human resources management and benefits analysis services, and marketing and advertising services; providing group restoring and purchasing services for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial analysis and consultation services; providing advice and resources regarding investment and financing issues and opportunities; providing referrals to potential investors and sources of equity; financial investment in the form of investments in high technology and other companies; providing a web site on a global computer network providing financial and investment advice, counseling, and referrals; rental of office space, furnishings and equipment for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing a web site on a global computer network featuring information regarding a wide variety of business, computing, high technology and investment related topics; computer services, namely, creating, designing, maintaining, and hosting websites for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |