USPTO serial 75877458
DRAFTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2776011Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 21, 2003
- Examiner
- GEARIN, AMY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DRAFTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Advanced Cleaning Technologies, Inc.
Northville, MI
Other trademarks owned by Advanced Cleaning Technologies, Inc.
Advanced Cleaning Technologies, Inc.
Northville, MI
Other trademarks owned by Advanced Cleaning Technologies, Inc.
Chandler, AZ
Chandler, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID G. DUCKWORTH
DAVID G DUCKWORTH DRUMMOND & DUCKWORTH5000 BIRCH ST STE 440, E TWRNEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cleaners for the food and beverage industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 15, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Cleaning Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Cleaning Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by EP Consulting
- Other trademarks owned by EP Consulting
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named DRAFTEC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 4, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 22, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |