Drawing for VEGGIEBALLS

USPTO serial 75877627

VEGGIEBALLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VEGGIEBALLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ESSA HICKS

P O BOX 26724OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73126UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Prepared frozen vegetarian food products, namely, vegetable meatball substitutes provided to food service institutionsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 4, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 1, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jan 23, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 23, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Aug 11, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 26, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 26, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 14, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jun 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 27, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 20, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 27, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 16, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance