USPTO serial 75878078
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Invent Umwelt- und Verfahrenstechnik GmbH & Co. Kg
91058 Erlangen, DE
Other trademarks owned by Invent Umwelt- und Verfahrenstechnik GmbH & Co. Kg
Invent Umwelt- und Verfahrenstechnik GmbH & Co. Kg
91058 Erlangen, DE
Other trademarks owned by Invent Umwelt- und Verfahrenstechnik GmbH & Co. Kg
Invent Umwelt- und Verfahrenstechnik GmbH & Co. Kg
Erlangen, DE
Other trademarks owned by Invent Umwelt- und Verfahrenstechnik GmbH & Co. Kg
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth F. Florek
Kenneth F. Florek FLOREK & ENDRES PLLC552 Seventh Avenue, Suite 601New York, NY 10018UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electrical sewage and wastewater treatment apparatus and instruments, namely, stirrers, hyperboloid stirrers, drawing devices for stirrers, submersed motors or stirrers, [ fillings for trickling filters, sewage and sludge pumps, ] mixers, agitators, all for the use in the automatic operation of sewage clarification plants and wastewater treatment plants; electrical sewage and wastewater treatment apparatus and instruments, namely, stirrers, hyperboloid stirrers, drawing devices for stirrers, submersed motors for stirrers, fillings for trickling filters, sewage and sludge pumps, mixers, agitators, all for the use in the automatic operation of facilities for mixing and aeration of sewage, floating sludge, and return sludge as part of a biological sewage purification process | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Sewage clarification and wastewater treatment plants, sewage purification and treatment plants, namely, sewage treatment plants for mixing and aeration of sewage, floating sludge and return sludge, for working of a biological sewage purification process, and for biological phosphorus removal and de-nitrification | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | [ Engineering, architectural consultation, construction drafting and technical consultation, all in the fields of aeration, drainage and treatment of sewage and sludge; Computer programming for others ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2022 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 25, 2022 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 11, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 6, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 6, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 29, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 7, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |