Drawing for HYPERVENT

USPTO serial 75878099

HYPERVENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GOLDEN, JAMES B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HYPERVENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas R. Vigil

THOMAS R VIGIL VIGIL & ASSOCIATES836 S NW HWYBARRINGTON, IL 60010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical apparatus and instruments for control of automatic operation of sewage clarification plants and wastewater treatment plants; electrical apparatus and instruments for controlling the automatic operation of facilities for mixing and aeration of sewage, floating sludge and return sludge for working of a biological sewage purification processACTIVE
011Apparatus, instruments and mechanical equipment for clarification plants and wastewater treatment plants, namely-- apparatus and instruments for aeration and circulation; stirrers; hyperboloid stirrers; drawing devices for stirrers; submersed motors for stirrers; water distribution devices, fillings for trickling filters comprising pieces of rock and/or synthetic material and/or filling elements fabricated of porous materials; pumps for sewage and sludge; devices for lifting; cranes; clarification plants and wastewater treatment plants comprising the above- mentioned components; facilities for mixing and aeration of sewage, floating, sludge and return sludge for working of a biological sewage purification processACTIVE
042Engineering, architectural consultation and construction drafting, technical consultation, all of them in the fields of aeration, drainage, treatment of sewage and sludge; computer programmingACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 10, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 24, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 17, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance